Comments on: Mustang vs. GTO

By: jimmy

jimmy — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:40:16 +0000

GTO is a way better buy i disagree with this little article. u can get a 400 hp gto for about 25k or a mustang gt with 300 hp for about the same price. also gto handels a lot better ive driven both cars so i know what im talking about

By: Mikey

Mikey — Fri, 25 May 2007 06:13:12 +0000

GTO….400 HP and 400 LB FT of Torque… http://www.pontiac.com look it up… i like the GTO better it looks pretty cool but i do agree they need to make a new GTO similar to the older models

By: Lydia

Lydia — Thu, 10 May 2007 09:59:15 +0000

I totally don’t agree with you. I own a v8 mustang and i use to think it was the shit out there lol UNTIL i drove a GTO. I would trade my mustang in for a Goat in a HEART BEAT!! Unlike you I would sell my soul to own a GTO. You can say that GTO’s are rare you hardly see them out there, unlike mustangs THEY’RE EVERYWHERE!! After driving the GTO i don’t refer to my stang as a stang, i call her my pony now.

By: Josh

Josh — Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:39:09 +0000

The only thing I hate more than comment spam are taxes. You guys should require registration or something to clean this crap up. Great blog otherwise!

By: Scott

Scott — Sun, 08 May 2005 19:08:07 +0000

I have basically thought along the same lines: the new Mustang looks better, has a slight performance edge, and may be slightly cheaper (though GM is offering thousands of dollars of incentives to move the GTOs).

However, I was browsing eBay Motors a couple days ago and saw several 2004 GTOs with just a few thousand miles on them going for around $24,000 with the “Buy it now” option.

That made me sit up and give the GTO another think.

By: John S. Rhodes

John S. Rhodes — Wed, 29 Dec 2004 01:05:25 +0000

I love Mustangs. I bought a 1969 but it needed so much work I was never able to drive it. I bought it for $500 and sold it for $950. Hooray for making a profit! In any case, I loved the style of that car. The 2005 model reminds me of the 1969 style, and I just love it. That’s all. Useless comment #2,454,298 …

By: creamy

creamy — Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:58:42 +0000

if it /was/ 246 for under $20k i would definitely consider it, but man, you GOTTA have the 300hp.

By: Eric Lorraine

Eric Lorraine — Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:04:16 +0000

Whoa, uh.. 210 is the correct number there, I must’ve typed it wrong. My bad, I even went to that site in my research. 246 doesn’t even show up on that page at all. That’s a nasty typo - sorry for the mix up and thanks for the update.

By: creamy

creamy — Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:57:37 +0000

V6 Mustang - 210hp - http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/mustang/features/specs/

By: Mike Rundle

Mike Rundle — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 18:29:31 +0000

Hey Ryan, you’re absolutely right. I think those pictures were of either pre-release versions of the cars, or semi-souped up versions.