Sliding Doors: Too Un-Cool for Crossovers?

It seems we’re in the midst of crossover mania lately. But with a few exceptions, there seems to be a common thread, or rather a common thread that’s conspicuous by its absence.


It seems we’re in the midst of crossover mania lately. But with a few exceptions, there seems to be a common thread, or rather a common thread that’s conspicuous by its absence.

Let’s review: Chrysler Pacifica, Mercedes R-Class, Ford Edge, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave. All four-door, wagon-ish-like contraptions with their respective manufacturers touting them as segment-shattering, all-new vehicular concepts. In reality, they’re just tall wagons or low-slung SUVs. (Take your pick.)

But all of these examples have conventional, frontal-hinged rear doors. The rear doors on the Mercedes, in particular, are freakishly long, almost coupe-like appendages. Perhaps this affords ideal ingress when the valet pulls it up to the front door of Ruth’s Chris, but if this runway model-mom mobile was subjected to the quotidian routine of the shopping mall and supermarket, I assure you those long doors would be far more of a liability than an asset.

Even the latest versions of the Ford Fairlane concept have eschewed sliding rear doors for conventional front-hingers. While only Ford knows ultimately what the production version will have, they won’t be sliders if the predominant trend continues.

So why this seemingly irrational aversion to sliding rear doors? Certainly from a functional standpoint, rear sliders are a lot more practical in narrow parking slots, requiring only a few lateral inches to fully open. In addition, most minivans now offer a remote power sliding feature, making them even handier.

Ah yes, minivans. The “M” word, the insidious icon of suburbia that even “soccer moms” shudder to be associated with and which rear sliders are unshakably associated.

So my question, soccer moms, general consumers, and vehicle designers…is
this: Is it better to look cool, or to have real, usable, practical functionality? And really, how cool will you really look walking out to your “crossover,” sack of groceries in one hand, screaming 2 year-old in the other, trying to open that huge rear door in a crowded parking lot, all the while trying not to spill your booty of Doritos, 1-percent milk, Cap’n Crunch, and ground beef? All the while, you look over in envy to the perky Stepford-ish mom effortlessly pushing the buttons on her remote and simultaneously popping the rear hatch and opening the sliding door on her Grand Caravan, depositing the evening’s dinner ingredients in the back and buckling little Billy in the second row, drama-free.

Will the second-generation “crossovers” get sliding rears once former minivan owners, who had purchased the first generation CUVs, realize how much they miss their rear sliders? Time will tell if function will trump consumer vanity.

Edward A. Sanchez

5 comments so far

It’ll be interesting to see if the sliding-door makes a comeback. My prediction is that it will only come back once the sliding door is deemed “cool” (again?) by society and the media. But until then, even soccer moms seem to have the need to be hip and trendy despite the ramifications.
As a side note, the fullsize van we own sports the sliding door and makes it look cool.
And personally, sliding door, no sliding door… whatever floats your boat; you wouldn’t lose points on my coolness scale.

Monica T.
October 25th, 2006 at 1:15 am

Great observation. Crossovers will likely keep their doors for a while due to the stigma attached to the minivan title, like you suggest. The minute a vehicle gets a slider, it becomes a van and even the Honda Odyssey commercial with clips of 70’s conversion vans that today’s Odyssey drivers might have driven, vans will always be vans. The big horizontal slot on the side of the body behind a slider just wouldn’t look cool enough on a Pacifica. But you’re totally right about the functionality of a slider making the owner’s life easier with the power option etc. Maybe scissor style is the answer. (not)

Mike
October 25th, 2006 at 4:07 pm

minivans will always be uncool, as will sliding doors. and in the autoworld, form will at least for a while always trump fuction.

robt
October 25th, 2006 at 4:10 pm

I am ANXIOUSLY awaiting for the day that crossovers, (with plenty of space and not so big to climb into) have remote entry sliding doors. Who can we talk to so that this happens???

JK
December 22nd, 2006 at 8:05 pm

I’ve been watching for models with sliding doors for years. I use a wheelchair and I am waiting for a small vehicle with sliding rear doors and fold away seats. The lack of a B pillar makes it possible to have a car without modifications. The Mazda5 is a candidate. The Mitsubishi Expo only had the slider on 1 side. The 98 Nissan Stanza worked well also.

The current minivans are too tall to transfer into and pull the chair up.
Universal design is the premise of making things easier for multiple demographics. Elderly, disabled, athletes, parents and more can stand to have life be easier and more functional.
The space wagon is a more common format in Europe. If more cargo space is needed for the trip that happens twice a year a rooftop carrier can be used. Let’s encourage car manufacturers to look more at ergonomics than fashion.

eric
December 30th, 2006 at 4:15 am

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.