<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Return of the Taurus Makes Sense, But Ford will still Die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joel A</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-912</guid>
		<description>densityduck,

oops! thanks for the spot. explanation has been added to the end of the post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>densityduck,</p>
<p>oops! thanks for the spot. explanation has been added to the end of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joela</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>joela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-911</guid>
		<description>smellerton, luciano,
i believe the taurus/five hundred is a stop gap to the next incarnation of the new taurus. i wouldn't be surprised if the 2009 version is considerably different
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smellerton, luciano,<br />
i believe the taurus/five hundred is a stop gap to the next incarnation of the new taurus. i wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the 2009 version is considerably different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Wildflower</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Wildflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-910</guid>
		<description>Ford 500..  They ripped the rear-end styling off of the Audi A4, they shoulda ripped off some more of its fun-to-drive..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford 500..  They ripped the rear-end styling off of the Audi A4, they shoulda ripped off some more of its fun-to-drive..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DensityDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-909</guid>
		<description>You have an asterisk on "fun", but it doesn't have a footnote...what's that about?

As for the Taurus:  Meh.  I agree that "Five Hundred" doesn't imply "consumer sedan", but that's the fault of the dealers, and of Ford itself--I don't recall seeing many ads that said "The 500 Is A New, Affordable Full-Size Family Sedan" in so many words.  And the thing is, when you add chrome frippery and fancy fixtures, the thing &lt;i&gt;looks&lt;/i&gt; like it's supposed to be a luxury car--and potential owners think "gosh that looks expensive, and I don't want an expensive car, I'll go buy a cheap Honda instead."
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have an asterisk on &#8220;fun&#8221;, but it doesn&#8217;t have a footnote&#8230;what&#8217;s that about?</p>
<p>As for the Taurus:  Meh.  I agree that &#8220;Five Hundred&#8221; doesn&#8217;t imply &#8220;consumer sedan&#8221;, but that&#8217;s the fault of the dealers, and of Ford itself&#8211;I don&#8217;t recall seeing many ads that said &#8220;The 500 Is A New, Affordable Full-Size Family Sedan&#8221; in so many words.  And the thing is, when you add chrome frippery and fancy fixtures, the thing <i>looks</i> like it&#8217;s supposed to be a luxury car&#8211;and potential owners think &#8220;gosh that looks expensive, and I don&#8217;t want an expensive car, I&#8217;ll go buy a cheap Honda instead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-908</guid>
		<description>I still don't get it.  Taurus?   What a horrible name.  Why would you name your car after a cow?   Why not just name it the Ford Bessie and be done with it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t get it.  Taurus?   What a horrible name.  Why would you name your car after a cow?   Why not just name it the Ford Bessie and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luciano</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Luciano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-907</guid>
		<description>I agree with the precedent comment and I also say that the latest Taurus is very ugly and old looking!!!What is happening to Ford design center?

&lt;a href="http://www.lucianobove.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.lucianobove.blogspot.com&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the precedent comment and I also say that the latest Taurus is very ugly and old looking!!!What is happening to Ford design center?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lucianobove.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lucianobove.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smellerton</title>
		<link>http://www.thecarblog.com/the_hot_new_ish/why_the_return_of_the_taurus_makes_sense_but_ford_will_still_die.php/comment-page-1#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>smellerton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecarblogtest.com/?p=236#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Boring sells cars.  As an enthusiast, I loathe the Camry.  I applaud Honda for selling a 6 speed manual on their 6 cylinder versions of the Accord.  But it seems that boring sells more cars than cars with manuals.  Lazy Americans want to put it in D, in contrast to Europe where 80% of the cars are manuals.  I digress, this seems to be a good strategy for Ford.  Toyota has all but abandoned any vehicle in their lineup (Scion withstanding) that is not boring.  I think the Taurus name has a lot of brand equity from before they turned it into an ovoid spaceship in the mid nineties redesign.  I think the real problem here is not the name, but the fact that this new Taurus / rebadged 500 is still ugly as sin.  I mean come on, those tailights look rediculous.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boring sells cars.  As an enthusiast, I loathe the Camry.  I applaud Honda for selling a 6 speed manual on their 6 cylinder versions of the Accord.  But it seems that boring sells more cars than cars with manuals.  Lazy Americans want to put it in D, in contrast to Europe where 80% of the cars are manuals.  I digress, this seems to be a good strategy for Ford.  Toyota has all but abandoned any vehicle in their lineup (Scion withstanding) that is not boring.  I think the Taurus name has a lot of brand equity from before they turned it into an ovoid spaceship in the mid nineties redesign.  I think the real problem here is not the name, but the fact that this new Taurus / rebadged 500 is still ugly as sin.  I mean come on, those tailights look rediculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
